tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36357868.post4314113054236922611..comments2023-05-18T06:55:27.293-04:00Comments on TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS PROPERS IN ENGLISH: SAINT JOHN BEFORE THE LATIN GATEDeacon Johnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17122314555763113859noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36357868.post-304225203336646062011-05-06T19:20:28.306-04:002011-05-06T19:20:28.306-04:00It is listed in the calendar for Traditional Masse...It is listed in the calendar for Traditional Masses at: http://www.traditio.com/calendar/cal1105.htm<br />It is also listed in my Saints calendar from Tan publishers.<br /><br />In the 'liturgical books of 1962' the feast of St. John before the Latin Gate has been abolished from the Calendar despite its appearance in seventh century liturgical texts and a fifth century church being dedicated to the event. <br />The delightful feast of St. John before the Latin Gate is of greater-double rite. The feast appears in the Gregorian Sacramentaries on May 6th and and is the dedication festival for the fifth century church in Rome named after the feast. The feast commemorates the 'martyrdom' of St. John the Evangelist as described by Tertullian in the year AD 92. On the orders of Domitian St. John was cast into a cauldron of hot oil yet emerged unscathed and was exiled to the island of Patmos.<br />The church, in Rome, of San Giovanni a Porta Latina was dedicated in honour of this feast and used to be a liturgical station on Saturday in Passion Week.<br />From http://ordorecitandi.blogspot.com/2011/05/st-john-before-latin-gate.htmlDeacon Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17122314555763113859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36357868.post-33198333468756091172011-05-06T18:54:48.769-04:002011-05-06T18:54:48.769-04:00I don't believe this feast is celebrated in th...I don't believe this feast is celebrated in the 1962 (John XXIII) missale according to the missale I downloaded at sanctamissa.org. Is this correct? Was this Feast eliminated from the 1962 missale (and therefore would not be celebrated in the extraordinary form under summorum pontificum)?DanJay1983https://www.blogger.com/profile/06923142801518377566noreply@blogger.com